Monday, 4 July 2016

Panel Beaten Monkey



FYI: A "Panel Beater" = Auto body mechanic in Monkeytown-ese
This Monkey was recently invited to shit himself sit on a SANS DFIR Summit panel discussing Innovation in Mobile Forensics with an All-Star cast of Andrew Hoog, Heather Mahalik, Cindy Murphy and Chris Crowley. While it rated well with the audience, personally (because its all about THIS monkey!) - it seemed that whenever I thought of something relevant, another panel member chirped up with a similar idea and/or the discussion moved on to the next question.
I felt it was kinda difficult to contribute something meaningful yet concise in a 30 second sound bite. Especially for my first open question speaking gig.
Monkey might need to decrease his deferential politeness and/or increase his use of assertive poo flinging in future panel discussions. Alternative suggestions are also welcome in the comments :)

Here's the synopsis of the panel from the DFIR Summit Program ...
Puzzle Solving and Science: The Secret Sauce of Innovation in Mobile Forensics
In today’s world, technology (especially mobile device technology) moves at a much faster pace than any of us can keep up with, and available training and research doesn’t always address the problems we encounter. As forensic examiners we face the daily challenges of new apps, new, updated and obscure operating systems, malware, secure apps, pass code and password protected phones, encoding and encryption problems, new artifacts, and broken hardware in order to obtain the evidence we need in a legally defensible and forensically sound manner.  In this session, learn from consistent and experienced innovators in the mobile forensics field the tips, tricks, and mindset that they bring to bear on the toughest problems and how to move beyond cookie cutter forensics towards an approach that allows you to successfully solve and own problems others might consider too hard to even try.


Anyhoo, the initial concept was to have several one word themed slides and discuss how these traits can help with innovation in mobile forensics.
Due to a panel format change, the original slides didn't get much play time so monkey thought he'd run through them now and present his thoughts with a focus on advice for those newer to mobile forensics. Some of the points made here may have been mentioned during the panel by other speakers but at least here I have time to elaborate and present my point of view. Bonus huh?

Now let's meet the panel ... Can you tell that we went for a superhero introductory theme?

Heather Mahalik!

Cindy Murphy!

Chris Crowley!


Andrew Hoog!

Cheeky4n6monkey!
 And now onto the rest of the slides ...

Curiosity


This is what attracts most of us to forensics. How does "Stuff" work and given a set of resultant data, how can we reconstruct what happened?
Documenting your curiosity (via blog post, white paper, journal article) is a great way of both sharing knowledge with the community and demonstrating your ability to research and think independently.
In mobile forensics, curiosity will usually lead to hex diving especially when hunting for new artifacts.
Curiosity naturally leads to "Squirrel chasing" where one interesting artifact can lead you to many others. So you might start out with one focus and end up discovering a bunch of cool artifacts.

Creativity


Our ability to create solutions depends on our paint set. The wider array of skills you have as a mobile forensic examiner, the more creative you can be - especially as mobile devices are a combination of both hardware and software.
For inspiration, background knowledge and anticipating future trends, read research papers, blogs, books, patents, mobile device service manuals/schematics and industry standards (eg eMMC JEDEC standard). Knowing the background details today will help you analyze tomorrow's device.
Start with a popular make/model and learn how a device works. Go to ifixit.com and the FCC website for pictures of device breakdowns. Read up on how eMMC Flash memory devices work. You don't have to be able to MacGyver a mobile device on a desert island but familiarize yourself with the fundamental concepts (eg eMMC memory has a NAND Controller acting as the interface to the actual NAND memory).
Look at how an SQLite database is structured. Most apps rely on these types of databases to store their data. The official website is a great place to start.
Develop/practise skills in soldering, chipoff, network forensics, malware reverse engineering, scripting for artifacts.
Know how to find/make/use automated tools. Tools can be used as intended/documented (eg NetworkMiner to read .pcaps) or in more novel ways (eg use an Android emulator to create app artifacts and save on rooting test devices/acquisition time).

Scientific Method

As mobile devices change (use of devices, underlying hardware, encryption, new apps/OS artifacts) we need to be able to record our observations in a structured, repeatable way and be able to communicate our findings to others.
The best way is to create your own data on a test device using a documented set of known actions. As Adam Savage from Mythbusters says: "Remember, kids, the only difference between screwing around and science is writing it down".
Also, as Mari Degrazia (and Meoware Kitty) showed us at the DFIR Summit, you should also "Trust But Verify" your tools.

Perseverance


Don't let failure discourage you if/when it comes.
You may need to use a different technique or change your assumptions. Or wait for new developments by someone else and revisit.
There may be more than one solution. Evaluate which is better or worse. The faster method is not always the most comprehensive.
You are not alone. Chances are someone else in the community may have the keys to your problem. Ask around Twitter, forensic forums and your professional network.

Teamwork/Collaboration


No one monkey knows ALL THE THINGS.
I find it helpful to email a trusted group of mobile forensic gurus and describe what I am seeing. Even if they are not able to help directly, it forces me to structure my thinking and help me question my approach.
Having a trusted group you can bounce ideas/findings off helps both yourself and potentially everyone in the group who may not have the time to otherwise investigate. The increased pool of experience and potential access to more varied test data are added bonuses as well. There is also an inherent double checking of your analysis.
Communicate your ideas often. Even if you start feeling like a spam monkey, realize that people can come up with amazing ideas/suggestions when prompted with the right stimulus.
Share your innovation with the community - they may be able to help you improve it and/or adapt it for another purpose that you never would have thought of.

Choose your team wisely though. There are some "One way transaction" types who you can help and then never hear from again. Be aware that it is a small community and word does get around about potential time wasters/bullshitters. 
Alternatively, you might be contacted by some rude farker after some free advice/labour - eg "You seem like you know what you are doing. Here's my problem ..."
Realize that being polite/considerate goes a long way to building the required level of trust. Recognize that you are probably asking someone to give up their free time for your cause.
Give team mates a default "opt out" of receiving your spam. For example, "If you wish to keep receiving these types of emails, please let me know. Otherwise, Thankyou for your time." and if you don't hear back, stop sending shit. Most people in forensics will be keen to discover new artifacts/research but be sure to try to organize your thoughts before hitting send.

Manage people's expectations. If you don't know or are not sure - it is better to under promise and over deliver later. Don't feel bad about saying "I don't know" or "I'm currently working on other things and don't have the time right now".

Luck


I believe that you can make your own "Luck" through being prepared when the opportunity presents itself.
For example, I had difficulties landing a forensics job after finishing my graduate studies in Forensic Computing. The market here in Monkeytown was relatively small compared to the US.
Through personal research projects that I blogged about and multiple US internships, I was able to land a rare and Monkeytown based forensic research dream job for which I am still counting my blessings. Having a documented prior body of work helped make the recruitment process so much easier (it also helped that there were technical people in charge of the recruiting).
Pure forensic research jobs seem to be rare in this industry - most positions seems to require a significant element of case work/billable hours. So I really appreciate the ability to pick an area or device and "research the shit out out of it".

On the other hand, occasionally in a case, you can have some plain old good fortune such as when Cindy Murphy and I were looking at a Windows Phone 8 device and we found an SMS stating "Da Code is ..." (which ended up being the PIN code for the phone).


Questions?



I just included this slide because I think it was one of my better 'toons in the slide deck :)

Final Thoughts

Physical fitness and rest are also important factors in staying creative. In the past, I've had some difficulties sleeping which obviously had an adverse affect on my work. A light regimen of regular exercise (15 minutes x 3 times per week) on the stationary bike has worked wonders on my tiredness levels and aerobic fitness. The paunch still remains a work in progress however ;)
For those interested, check out Dr Michael Mosely and Peta Bee's excellent research book on High Intensity Training (HIT) called FastExercise. It shows how you don't have to spend a huge amount of time at the gym to start seeing some immediate health benefits.

So long as you remain committed to learning, the innovation will come. Don't sweat about the non creative periods.

Learning to script is a good way of forcing you to understand how data is stored at the binary level. Python is a popular choice in forensics for its readability, many existing code libraries and large user base.

A library of "most likely to be encountered" test devices can help you to create before/after reference data sets to validate your research. These may be sourced privately from online (eg eBay) or from previous cases.

When public speaking, I have to learn to project my voice more. Elgin from the SANS AV crew kindly took the time after the panel to advise me to speak more from the diaphragm in the future. Concrete feedback like this is the best way to improve my speaking ability. Having said that, maybe monkey also needs to dose up on the caffeine before the next panel so he can react quicker/with more urgency. I'm guessing experience is the best teacher though.

The 2016 SANS DFIR Summit Presentation Slides are now available from here. Get them while they're hot!

Special Thanks to Jennifer Santiago (Director of Content Development & SANS Summit Speaker Wrangler) for her patience in dealing with this first time speaker/panellist.
Special Thanks also to my fellow panellists Andrew, Chris, Cindy and Heather for welcoming this monkey as a peer rather than a curiosity.

Not to get all heavy and philosophical on you but I found this quote that pretty much sums up my thoughts on innovation. It is from Nguyen Quyen who apparently was a Vietnamese Anti-French Colonist from the early part of the 20th Century. Ain't Google great?

"Successful innovation is not a single breakthrough. It is not a sprint. It is not an event for the solo runner. Successful innovation is a team sport, it's a relay race."

Good luck quoting that on a panel and not sounding like a complete wanker though ;)

If anyone has some suggestions for how I can improve my panel talking skills or would like to share some tips on innovation in mobile forensics, please leave a comment. Thanks!



5 comments:

  1. Great post! As a fellow researcher, I'll chime in to say that one of our major challenges with innovation is identifying a viable platform to communicate findings. While technology advances so quickly in our field, news of research findings seems to travel slowly. Not a good combo for mobile forensics ;) Twitter, blog posts, and research papers work pretty well for me, but I'm not most people. How do we better get the word out?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey,

      Thanks for reading.
      There are some blog sites which review and amalgamate DFIR news (eg https://thisweekin4n6.wordpress.com). That's probably one of the quickest ways of getting research widely noticed.
      Researchers could also publish a brief of their research to some of the forensic forums/mailing lists out there.
      Or maybe if they're in it for the long haul, they could start their own mailing list or a website dedicated to publishing forensic research?
      Thats about all I can think of ...

      Cheers,

      Cheeky

      Delete
    2. ugh, not thisweekin4n6...that guys a hack! ;)

      Unknown, if you want to share your research there's plenty of platforms...it takes 5 minutes to start a blog (4 minutes of which is trying to think of a name) using blogger or wordpress, if you share some research and let me know I'll share it out to the wider audience.

      Delete
  2. Something that may assist researchers is to "do the ask". If there's some topic that you're specifically interested in, start by Googling it, and then get on various forums or social media and ask if anyone has or has seen anything.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Harlan.

      I also get good results by similarly consulting with a few selected peers/experts currently working in the mobile forensics field. Having that network can allow for freer discussions compared to discussions on public forums/social media.

      Cheers,

      Cheeky

      Delete